반도체 칩 개발에 필요한차세대 EDA 및 CAD 플랫폼

요금제 보기 클라우드 콘솔 열기

FileEditViewGoTerminal

Explorer

analyze

altifigence-npu-full-v003

altifigence-npu-full-v002

altifigence-npu-full-v001

rtl

41module CVO_top (

// The sub_emax bf16_add (align + 25-bit add + normalize) is the integrated worst

// path; even after the 1a/1b split the align+add together were too long, so the

// barrel-shift align and the 25-bit add are now separated by their own register

// (sa0 holds the sign-extended aligned operands). Latency +1, bit-identical.

bf16_t sa_av_wire, sa_bv_wire;

logic [ 7:0] sa_emax_wire;

logic [23:0] sa_aa_wire, sa_ba_wire;

always_comb begin : comb_sub_emax_align

sa_av_wire = to_bf16(in_data_s0);

sa_bv_wire = to_bf16({~in_emax_s0[15], in_emax_s0[14:0]}); // -e_max

sa_emax_wire = (sa_av_wire.exp > sa_bv_wire.exp) ? sa_av_wire.exp : sa_bv_wire.exp;

sa_aa_wire = align_to_emax(sa_av_wire, sa_emax_wire);

sa_ba_wire = align_to_emax(sa_bv_wire, sa_emax_wire);

end

// Stage sa0 — register the sign-extended aligned operands (align off the adder).

logic signed [24:0] sa0_aa, sa0_ba;

logic [ 7:0] sa0_emax;

logic [15:0] sa0_pass;

logic sa0_subemax;

logic sa0_valid;

always_ff @(posedge clk) begin

if (!rst_n || i_clear) begin

sa0_valid <= 1'b0;

end else begin

sa0_aa <= $signed({sa_aa_wire[23], sa_aa_wire});

sa0_ba <= $signed({sa_ba_wire[23], sa_ba_wire});

sa0_emax <= sa_emax_wire;

sa0_pass <= in_data_s0;

sa0_subemax <= uop_flags.sub_emax;

sa0_valid <= in_valid_s0;

end

// Stage 1a-back — the 25-bit signed add, now isolated on its own register stage.

logic signed [24:0] sa_sum;

logic [ 7:0] sa_emax;

logic [15:0] sa_pass; // in_data_s0 carried for the non-sub_emax case

logic sa_subemax;

logic sa_valid;

always_ff @(posedge clk) begin

if (!rst_n || i_clear) begin

sa_valid <= 1'b0;

end else begin

sa_sum <= sa0_aa + sa0_ba;

sa_emax <= sa0_emax;

sa_pass <= sa0_pass;

sa_subemax <= sa0_subemax;

sa_valid <= sa0_valid;

end

Executive summary

altifigence_npu_top · Full bundle B

This stored analysis run brings together 12 artifacts. The report links each observation to the source artifact.

Waveform capture B	Signals 148
Schematic snapshot B	Instances 42
seed-full-analysis-run	Kernels 6
Path analyzer B	Paths 31
Memory dump B	Regions 6
Event timeline B	Events 11.1k
Perf chart B	MAC avg 44.2%
Timing report B	WNS -0.07 ns
PPA snapshot B	Power 21.3 W
Evidence bundle B	Claims 14
Data flow B	Nodes 36
3D canvas B	Grid 32 × 32

Module	altifigence_npu_top
Source	rtl/altifigence-v002/LLM/rtl/top/altifigence_npu_top.sv
Run	altifigence-npu-full-v003
Named view	Full bundle B
Artifacts	12

Methodology

The report reads the saved analysis bundle and reorganizes its metrics, detail rows, and notes into document sections.

Each artifact retains its own units and status. Compare neighboring metrics within the same artifact, then follow its source path to the stored evidence.

Waveform	signal transitions and capture timing
Schematic	module connections and structural evidence
Roofline	compute throughput and arithmetic intensity
Path	critical paths and timing evidence
Memory	memory traffic and bandwidth
Events	recorded event activity
Perf	performance samples and utilization trends
Timing	timing margins
PPA	power, performance, and area estimates
Signoff	stored validation evidence
Data Flow	data movement between compute stages
3D Canvas	stored spatial and placement evidence

Findings register

Flagged metrics from the stored artifacts.

Waveform · MAC util	47.5%
Waveform · Stalls	518
Schematic · Inline	1
Schematic · Diagnostics	2
Path · Worst slack	-0.07 ns
Path · Logic levels	14
Path · Fanout	26
Memory · Reads	1.4 GB/s
Memory · Writes	1.6 GB/s
Events · MAC	36%
Events · Stalls	18%
Perf · MAC avg	44.2%
Perf · L2 write	39.6%
Timing · WNS	-0.07 ns
Timing · TNS	-0.41 ns
Timing · Failing	3
PPA · Power	21.3 W
PPA · LUT util	67%
PPA · DSP util	79%
PPA · Freq	950 MHz
Signoff · Passed	10
Signoff · Open	4
Signoff · Coverage	78%
Data Flow · Edges	63
Data Flow · Max depth	11
Data Flow · Hot path	HP→DISP→MAC
3D Canvas · Avg util	41.7%
3D Canvas · Peak PE	99%
3D Canvas · Idle PEs	173

Report summary

Waveform capture B	Signals 148
Schematic snapshot B	Instances 42
seed-full-analysis-run	Kernels 6
Path analyzer B	Paths 31
Memory dump B	Regions 6
Event timeline B	Events 11.1k
Perf chart B	MAC avg 44.2%
Timing report B	WNS -0.07 ns
PPA snapshot B	Power 21.3 W
Evidence bundle B	Claims 14
Data flow B	Nodes 36
3D canvas B	Grid 32 × 32

01Waveform

Waveform capture B

4 metrics · 2 rows · 0 notes

4981200 cycles · 32 cores · higher stall density

Interpretation

The Waveform section reviews signal transitions and capture timing. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 2 detail row(s), and 0 note(s) from the “Waveform capture B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is MAC util = 47.5%. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 2.

The Waveform section contains critical-level signals. Use the 2 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is MAC util = 47.5%, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/waveform.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “Waveform capture B” result in Waveform requires additional review. Compare MAC util = 47.5% against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: Waveform requires careful interpretation. MAC util = 47.5% and 2 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

Signals	148
Ticks	4.98M
MAC util	47.5%
Stalls	518

Details

Top scope	u_gemm_systolic_top
Playhead	cycle 90210

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/waveform.json

02Schematic

Schematic snapshot B

4 metrics · 0 rows · 0 notes

Same hierarchy with fewer expanded inline blocks

Interpretation

The Schematic section reviews module connections and structural evidence. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 0 detail row(s), and 0 note(s) from the “Schematic snapshot B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is Inline = 1. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 2.

The Schematic section contains warning-level signals. Use the 2 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is Inline = 1, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/schematic.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “Schematic snapshot B” result in Schematic requires additional review. Compare Inline = 1 against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: Schematic requires careful interpretation. Inline = 1 and 2 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

Instances	42
Nets	186
Inline	1
Diagnostics	2

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/schematic.json

03Roofline

seed-full-analysis-run

4 metrics · 0 rows · 0 notes

Full bundle B · altifigence_npu_top

Interpretation

The Roofline section reviews compute throughput and arithmetic intensity. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 0 detail row(s), and 0 note(s) from the “seed-full-analysis-run” artifact into report form.

The first observation is Kernels = 6. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 0.

Read the Roofline metrics alongside the stored evidence and neighboring artifacts.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is Kernels = 6, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/roofline.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The source artifact preserves the values shown in this report.

AI opinion

AI opinion: compare Kernels = 6 with neighboring artifacts before drawing a conclusion.

Metrics

Kernels	6
Intensity	11.8
Achieved	15.1 GOPS
Avg util	41.7%

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/roofline.json

04Path

Path analyzer B

4 metrics · 2 rows · 0 notes

Weight dispatcher queue path is tighter

Interpretation

The Path section reviews critical paths and timing evidence. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 2 detail row(s), and 0 note(s) from the “Path analyzer B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is Worst slack = -0.07 ns. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 3.

The Path section contains critical-level signals. Use the 3 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is Worst slack = -0.07 ns, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/path-analyzer.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “Path analyzer B” result in Path requires additional review. Compare Worst slack = -0.07 ns against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: Path requires careful interpretation. Worst slack = -0.07 ns and 3 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

Paths	31
Worst slack	-0.07 ns
Logic levels	14
Fanout	26

Details

Start	GEMM_weight_dispatcher/clk
End	mem_u_operation_queue/push

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/path-analyzer.json

05Memory

Memory dump B

4 metrics · 2 rows · 0 notes

HP buffer pressure elevated

Interpretation

The Memory section reviews memory traffic and bandwidth. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 2 detail row(s), and 0 note(s) from the “Memory dump B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is Reads = 1.4 GB/s. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 2.

The Memory section contains warning-level signals. Use the 2 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is Reads = 1.4 GB/s, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/memory.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “Memory dump B” result in Memory requires additional review. Compare Reads = 1.4 GB/s against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: Memory requires careful interpretation. Reads = 1.4 GB/s and 2 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

Regions	6
Reads	1.4 GB/s
Writes	1.6 GB/s
Watches	3

Details

Hot region	HP Buffer FIFO
Cursor	0x1000_0140

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/memory.json

06Events

Event timeline B

4 metrics · 2 rows · 0 notes

More systolic stalls in mid window

Interpretation

The Events section reviews recorded event activity. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 2 detail row(s), and 0 note(s) from the “Event timeline B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is MAC = 36%. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 2.

The Events section contains critical-level signals. Use the 2 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is MAC = 36%, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/events.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “Event timeline B” result in Events requires additional review. Compare MAC = 36% against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: Events requires careful interpretation. MAC = 36% and 2 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

Events	11.1k
Cycles	220
MAC	36%
Stalls	18%

Details

Peak lane	SYSTOLIC_STALL
Marker	cycle 142

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/events.json

07Perf

Perf chart B

4 metrics · 0 rows · 0 notes

Lower MAC util with heavier DMA write share

Interpretation

The Perf section reviews performance samples and utilization trends. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 0 detail row(s), and 0 note(s) from the “Perf chart B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is MAC avg = 44.2%. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 2.

The Perf section contains warning-level signals. Use the 2 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is MAC avg = 44.2%, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/perf.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “Perf chart B” result in Perf requires additional review. Compare MAC avg = 44.2% against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: Perf requires careful interpretation. MAC avg = 44.2% and 2 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Graph

Metrics

MAC avg	44.2%
L2 read	35.8%
L2 write	39.6%
Samples	256

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/perf.json

08Timing

Timing report B

4 metrics · 2 rows · 0 notes

Post-impl summary — one failing path cluster

Interpretation

The Timing section reviews timing margins. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 2 detail row(s), and 0 note(s) from the “Timing report B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is WNS = -0.07 ns. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 3.

The Timing section contains critical-level signals. Use the 3 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is WNS = -0.07 ns, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/timing.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “Timing report B” result in Timing requires additional review. Compare WNS = -0.07 ns against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: Timing requires careful interpretation. WNS = -0.07 ns and 3 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

WNS	-0.07 ns
TNS	-0.41 ns
Failing	3
Endpoints	18.2k

Details

LUT	43,910
DSP	528

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/timing.json

09PPA

PPA snapshot B

4 metrics · 0 rows · 0 notes

Higher power for lower achieved throughput

Interpretation

The PPA section reviews power, performance, and area estimates. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 0 detail row(s), and 0 note(s) from the “PPA snapshot B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is Power = 21.3 W. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 4.

The PPA section contains critical-level signals. Use the 4 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is Power = 21.3 W, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/ppa.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “PPA snapshot B” result in PPA requires additional review. Compare Power = 21.3 W against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: PPA requires careful interpretation. Power = 21.3 W and 4 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

Power	21.3 W
LUT util	67%
DSP util	79%
Freq	950 MHz

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/ppa.json

10Signoff

Evidence bundle B

4 metrics · 0 rows · 1 notes

Regression vs bundle A on stall and timing claims

Interpretation

The Signoff section reviews stored validation evidence. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 0 detail row(s), and 1 note(s) from the “Evidence bundle B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is Passed = 10. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 3.

The Signoff section contains critical-level signals. Use the 3 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is Passed = 10, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/evidence.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “Evidence bundle B” result in Signoff requires additional review. Compare Passed = 10 against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: Signoff requires careful interpretation. Passed = 10 and 3 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

Claims	14
Passed	10
Open	4
Coverage	78%

Notes

Regression: timing closure and stall-rate claims diverged from bundle A.

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/evidence.json

11Data Flow

Data flow B

4 metrics · 3 rows · 1 notes

HP buffer back-pressure adds a feedback edge into the dispatcher

Interpretation

The Data Flow section reviews data movement between compute stages. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 3 detail row(s), and 1 note(s) from the “Data flow B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is Edges = 63. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 3.

The Data Flow section contains critical-level signals. Use the 3 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is Edges = 63, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/dataFlow.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “Data flow B” result in Data Flow requires additional review. Compare Edges = 63 against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: Data Flow requires careful interpretation. Edges = 63 and 3 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

Nodes	36
Edges	63
Max depth	11
Hot path	HP→DISP→MAC

Details

Source node	axi_hp_weight_dma
Sink node	result_packer
Feedback	hp_buffer_full → dispatcher

Notes

Back-pressure feedback edge present in this run; raises the longest dependency chain to 11.

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/dataFlow.json

123D Canvas

3D canvas B

4 metrics · 2 rows · 1 notes

Hot cluster in the south-east quadrant from DMA write stalls

Interpretation

The 3D Canvas section reviews stored spatial and placement evidence. It reorganizes 4 metric(s), 2 detail row(s), and 1 note(s) from the “3D canvas B” artifact into report form.

The first observation is Avg util = 41.7%. This value should be read against the neighboring metrics in the same artifact; the current flagged metric count is 3.

The 3D Canvas section contains critical-level signals. Use the 3 flagged metric(s) to trace cause and scope.

Evidence basis

This section summarizes 4 metric evidence item(s). The representative metric is Avg util = 41.7%, and source path is analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/canvas3d.json. The interpretation is linked to stored analysis output.

The “3D canvas B” result in 3D Canvas requires additional review. Compare Avg util = 41.7% against neighboring artifacts and inspect the detailed path in the full viewer.

AI opinion

AI opinion: 3D Canvas requires careful interpretation. Avg util = 41.7% and 3 flagged metric(s) remain the main review points.

Metrics

Grid	32 × 32
Avg util	41.7%
Peak PE	99%
Idle PEs	173

Details

Hottest tile	row 27 · col 29
Cold band	cols 0–6 starved

Notes

Utilisation skewed: a hot SE cluster coexists with a starved west band under heavier DMA writes.

analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/canvas3d.json

Traceability matrix

Waveform capture B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/waveform.json
Schematic snapshot B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/schematic.json
seed-full-analysis-run	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/roofline.json
Path analyzer B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/path-analyzer.json
Memory dump B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/memory.json
Event timeline B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/events.json
Perf chart B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/perf.json
Timing report B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/timing.json
PPA snapshot B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/ppa.json
Evidence bundle B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/evidence.json
Data flow B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/dataFlow.json
3D canvas B	analyze/altifigence-npu-full-v003/canvas3d.json

Technical conclusion

The Perf artifact reports MAC avg = 44.2%, with two metrics flagged for review. Compare the heavier DMA write share against the Memory and Waveform artifacts.

The report is based on the stored sample bundle; the preview does not execute a new analysis.

Waveform · MAC util	47.5%
Waveform · Stalls	518
Schematic · Inline	1
Schematic · Diagnostics	2
Path · Worst slack	-0.07 ns
Path · Logic levels	14
Path · Fanout	26
Memory · Reads	1.4 GB/s
Memory · Writes	1.6 GB/s
Events · MAC	36%
Events · Stalls	18%
Perf · MAC avg	44.2%
Perf · L2 write	39.6%
Timing · WNS	-0.07 ns
Timing · TNS	-0.41 ns
Timing · Failing	3
PPA · Power	21.3 W
PPA · LUT util	67%
PPA · DSP util	79%
PPA · Freq	950 MHz
Signoff · Passed	10
Signoff · Open	4
Signoff · Coverage	78%
Data Flow · Edges	63
Data Flow · Max depth	11
Data Flow · Hot path	HP→DISP→MAC
3D Canvas · Avg util	41.7%
3D Canvas · Peak PE	99%
3D Canvas · Idle PEs	173

07 Perf chart B

The representative metric for 07 Perf chart B is MAC avg = 44.2%. This category expands into lower artifact nodes in document form.

Reading focus

TOP

You are at the top of 07 Perf chart B. Confirm what artifact or report stage this category represents before reading details.

Current artifact

Artifact	Perf
Metric	MAC avg 44.2%
Status	WARN

<40s

초고속 AST 인덱싱¹

수백만 라인 대규모 RTL 및 모듈을 40초 이내에 실시간 증분 파싱

100%

표준 구문 정합성²

IEEE 1800-2017 SystemVerilog 표준 및 Sail 정형 명세 완전 호환

10x

검증 턴어라운드 단축³

합성 전 단계 자동 DRC & CDC 분석으로 디버깅 루프 대폭 축소

Zero

독점 락인 없는 개방성⁴

MCP 프로토콜과 CLI를 통해 기존 파이프라인 연계

원하는 AI와, 익숙한 설계 도구로.

AI 모델 연동⁵

지원 기술 및 도구⁵

Altifigence로 설계하는 오픈소스 하드웨어⁶

Altifigence 툴체인으로 직접 합성하고 검증하는 오픈소스 하드웨어 레퍼런스 프로젝트입니다.

PCCX.ai 프로젝트 문서 GitHub

소식을 불러오는 중입니다.

Digital Design Studio

로컬 우선 SystemVerilog · Verilog IDE
RTL 시뮬레이션, 실행 기록과 VCD 파형 분석
정형 동등성 검증 & Evolve PPA 탐색
SDC · UPF · LEF/DEF 업계 표준 호환

ALcad

회로도 · 고밀도 다층 PCB 일체형 CAD
실시간 3D 전장 기구 조립 클리어런스
고주파 SI/PI 전자기 신호 무결성 해석
Gerber X3 · IPC-2581 양산 데이터 연계

Altifigence Cloud

엔지니어링 팀 분산 프로젝트 워크스페이스
API · CLI · MCP(Model Context Protocol) 연동
클라우드 클러스터 대규모 병렬 합성
서명된 패키지 & 엔터프라이즈 보안 격리

개발자 플랫폼

Altifigence로 개발하기

Evolve를 포함한 Digital Design Studio, ALcad, Cloud, API, CLI, MCP를 확인하고 지능형 반도체 개발 환경을 구축하세요.

기술 문서

개발자 공식 문서

반도체 AST 분석 및 합성 기술 가이드, 제품 레퍼런스, API·CLI 규격과 Model Context Protocol(MCP) 연동 경로를 제공합니다.

투자 및 협력

투자 / 협력 문의

투자자와 글로벌 파트너에게 필요한 회사 핵심 자료와 투자 및 생태계 협력에 관한 공식 연락 채널을 안내합니다.

01 / 디지털 설계무료 · 입문

디지털 논리회로

디지털 신호와 AND·OR·XOR 등 논리 게이트에서 시작해 조합회로, 래치·플립플롭, 카운터와 상태 기계를 설계합니다. 진리표·수식·회로·파형을 직접 연결하고 RTL 실습으로 검증합니다. 선택 심화에서는 데이터패스와 인터페이스까지 확장합니다.

조합·순차논리SystemVerilog

코스 살펴보기

02 / 디지털 설계무료 · 기초

RTL 설계 기초

디지털 논리회로에서 배운 회로를 SystemVerilog로 표현합니다. 타입·폭·부호, 조합·순차논리, 모듈·매개변수·generate를 다루고 독립 테스트벤치로 경계와 실패를 검증합니다. 마지막에는 모듈을 연결한 주기 펄스·누산 회로와 실행 증거를 완성합니다.

SystemVerilog모듈 설계

코스 살펴보기

03 / 디지털 설계In preparation

RTL 설계: 데이터패스와 파이프라인

연산기와 제어부를 연결하고, 파이프라인으로 처리량을 높이는 작은 연산 시스템을 설계합니다.

데이터패스파이프라인

코스 살펴보기

¹AST 성능의 측정 환경과 범위
‘40초 미만’은 가상 CPU 8개, 메모리 32GiB, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 기반 클라우드 환경에서 Digital Design Studio로 PCCX v002 프로젝트의 사전 지정된 RTL 변경을 처리할 때의 증분 AST 갱신 시간입니다. 초기 분석과 사전 실행 3회를 마친 뒤, 동일한 초기 상태와 변경 조건에서 30회 측정한 중앙값을 기준으로 합니다. 최초 전체 분석, 프로젝트 업로드 및 네트워크 전송 시간은 포함하지 않습니다. 실제 처리 시간은 프로젝트 구조, 변경 범위, 캐시 상태 및 서버 자원에 따라 달라질 수 있습니다.
²테스트 통과율 및 언어 지원 범위
‘100%’는 Digital Design Studio의 측정 대상 빌드에서 PCCX v002 프로젝트를 기반으로 사전에 고정한 SystemVerilog 구문 회귀 테스트의 전체 대상 항목이 기대 결과를 충족한 비율입니다. 실패하거나 실행을 건너뛴 항목은 통과로 계산하지 않습니다. 해당 수치는 지정된 테스트 범위에 한하며, SystemVerilog 표준 전체의 준수나 시뮬레이션·합성 결과의 정확성, 제3자 도구와의 완전한 호환성을 의미하지 않습니다. Sail의 지원 및 검증 범위는 이 수치에 포함되지 않습니다.
³비교 대상과 성능 측정 방법
‘최대 10배’는 동일한 클라우드 환경과 Digital Design Studio 빌드에서 PCCX v002 프로젝트의 사전 지정된 변경 시나리오를 대상으로, 전체 재분석 방식과 증분 분석 방식의 검증 피드백 시간을 비교한 결과입니다. 두 방식에 동일한 DRC·CDC 점검 범위와 판정 기준을 적용하며, 각 방식에서 사전 실행 3회 후 30회 측정한 소요 시간의 중앙값을 비교합니다. 배율은 전체 재분석 시간의 중앙값을 증분 분석 시간의 중앙값으로 나눈 값이며, 사전에 정한 시나리오별 결과 중 최대값입니다. 전체 설계·검증 기간의 동일한 단축을 의미하지 않으며, 실제 결과는 설계 특성과 실행 환경에 따라 달라질 수 있습니다.
⁴인터페이스 연계 범위
‘개방성’은 Digital Design Studio에서 제공하는 MCP 인터페이스와 CLI 명령을 통해 외부 도구 및 자동화 파이프라인과 연계할 수 있음을 의미합니다. 이용 가능한 기능과 연동 범위는 제품 버전, 연동 대상의 설정, 접근 권한 및 라이선스 조건에 따라 달라질 수 있습니다. 제품 전체의 오픈소스 제공이나 모든 외부 도구와의 호환성을 의미하지 않습니다.
⁵상표 및 라이선스 고지
표시된 제3자의 명칭과 로고에 관한 권리는 각 권리자에게 있습니다. 해당 표시는 지원·연동 대상을 식별하기 위한 것이며, 별도 명시가 없는 한 해당 회사·단체와 Altifigence 간의 제휴·후원·인증 또는 보증 관계를 의미하지 않습니다. 각 기술과 도구의 이용에는 해당 권리자가 정한 라이선스 및 이용 조건이 적용됩니다.
⁶오픈소스 하드웨어 이용 조건
PCCX v002 관련 공개 소스의 이용에는 해당 저장소의 라이선스와 고지 사항이 적용됩니다. 연결된 KV260 통합 프로젝트 저장소에는 Apache License 2.0이 적용되며, 개별 파일이나 외부 구성 요소에 별도 라이선스가 명시된 경우에는 해당 조건을 따릅니다. 문서·이미지 등 자료의 이용 조건은 각 자료에 적용되는 라이선스를 확인해야 하며, 공개 소스의 이용 허락이 명칭·로고 등 상표의 사용 허락까지 의미하지는 않습니다.

반도체 칩 개발에 필요한차세대 EDA 및 CAD 플랫폼

Executive summary

Input lineage

Methodology

Findings register

Report summary

Waveform capture B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Details

Schematic snapshot B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

seed-full-analysis-run

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Path analyzer B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Details

Memory dump B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Details

Event timeline B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Details

Perf chart B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Graph

Metrics

Timing report B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Details

PPA snapshot B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Evidence bundle B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Notes

Data flow B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Details

Notes

3D canvas B

Interpretation

Evidence basis

AI opinion

Metrics

Details

Notes

Traceability matrix

Technical conclusion

RTL & Logic Design

Altifigence로 설계하는 오픈소스 하드웨어⁶